Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope November 2024
Huang Feng, et al. Expires 7 May 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-netana-netconf-notif-envelope-01
Updates:
RFC7950 RFC7951 RFC9254 (if approved)
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
A. Huang Feng
INSA-Lyon
P. Francois
INSA-Lyon
T. Graf
Swisscom
B. Claise
Huawei

Extensible YANG model for YANG-Push Notifications

Abstract

This document defines a new extensible notification structure, defined in YANG, for use in YANG-Push Notification messages enabling any YANG compatible encodings such as XML, JSON or CBOR.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 7 May 2025.

▲

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

YANG-Push [RFC8639] allows publishers to send notifications to a data collection. The YANG-Push receiver decodes the message and optionally validates the header and the content before forwarding to the next process.

The notification container from YANG-Push is currently based on the XML model from NETCONF Event Notifications [RFC5277]. This model has the drawback that only a single mandatory "eventTime" leaf is defined and does offer a way to extend this header with new metadata. Additionally, this XML model is only valid for XML-based environments. When messages are encoded in other YANG encodings, such as JSON [RFC7951] or CBOR [RFC9254], validators cannot use YANG to validate the message schema.

YANG data consumer receiving notifications require additional metadata to understand the full context of the received message. For example, in addition to the timestamp of when the event was encoded, it is also important to know the hostname which sourced the message, and have sequence numbers in generated messages so that lost notification messages can be detected. This additional metadata is also helpful to correlate the data with other sources of Network Telemetry [RFC9232] information.

For such reasons, this document proposes the following:

1.1. Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

The terms "subscriber", "publisher", and "receiver" are used as defined in [RFC8639].

The terms "client" is used as defined in [RFC6241] for NETCONF and [RFC8040] for RESTCONF.

The terms "implementation-time information" and "runtime information" are used as defined in [RFC9196].

2. Relationship to past documents

This section shows the relationship to [RFC5277], [RFC8639], [RFC7951] and [RFC9254].

2.1. Relationship to RFC5277

[RFC5277] defines a mechanism for NETCONF nodes to send notifications to a collector. These are the key relationships between the current document and [RFC5277]:

2.2. Relationship to RFC8639

Subscribed Notifications [RFC8639] defines a mechanism on top of [RFC5277] to stream notifications from the NETCONF node. These are the key relationships between the current document and [RFC8639]:

2.3. Relationship to RFC7950

[RFC7950] defines how YANG data is encoded in XML. These are the key relationship points between the current document and [RFC7950]:

2.4. Relationship to RFC7951

[RFC7951] defines how YANG data is encoded using JSON. These are the key relationship points between the current document and [RFC7951]:

2.5. Relationship to RFC9254

[RFC9254] defines how YANG data is encoded using CBOR. These are the key relationship points between the current document and [RFC9254]:

3. Solution

Section 4.2.10 of [RFC7950] defines the encoding of YANG notifications. A notification is created by defining a 'notification' statement in the YANG module. When a NETCONF server sends this notification, it is composed of two parts: a header containing metadata which encapsulates the content and the content defined by the 'notification' statement.

In YANG 1.1 [RFC7950], the notification header is based on the model defined in [RFC5277] which contains a single metadata 'eventTime' leaf. An example extracted from [RFC7950] is shown in the following XML:

  <notification
      xmlns="urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:notification:1.0">
    <eventTime>2007-09-01T10:00:00Z</eventTime>
    <link-failure xmlns="urn:example:system">
      <if-name>so-1/2/3.0</if-name>
      <if-admin-status>up</if-admin-status>
      <if-oper-status>down</if-oper-status>
    </link-failure>
  </notification>

This document defines a new notification header and enables extending it with new metadata. The notification header defined in the following sections is to be used in YANG-Push [RFC8641] environments and can be implemented with NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040].

Section 3.1 defines how a client enables the header defined in this document. Section 3.2 extends the model from [RFC9196] to enable clients to discover the capability of using the new notification header for both implementation-time information and runtime information. Lastly, Section 3.3.2 defines the new notification header and how it is encoded using XML, JSON and CBOR.

3.1. Enabling the Notification Envelope

The use of the notification envelope defined in this document can be enabled during the configuration of a YANG-Push subscription. This document augments the "ietf-subscribed-notification" model [RFC8639] to support the configuration of "notification-envelope".

  module: ietf-notification-container

    augment /sn:subscriptions/sn:subscription:
      +--rw enable-notification-envelope?   boolean {notification-envelope}?
      +--rw metadata
    augment /sn:establish-subscription/sn:input:
      +---w enable-notification-envelope?   boolean {notification-envelope}?
      +---w metadata
    augment /sn:modify-subscription/sn:input:
      +---w enable-notification-envelope?   boolean {notification-envelope}?
      +---w metadata

When the node 'enable-notification-envelope' is set to true, the notifications published by a YANG-Push publisher MUST use the header defined in Section 3.3.1. If any metadata is enabled during the configuration of the subscription, the metadata nodes MUST be present in the header.

3.2. Discovering the support of this model

A client can discover the support of 'notification-envelope' model through the capabilities model defined in [RFC9196]. This documents extends the 'ietf-notification-capabilities' model with a container that includes:

  • A leaf 'notification-envelope', stating that the YANG notification can be encoded following the notification-envelope model.
  • A container 'metadata' containing all the supported extensions to this header.

The YANG model defined in Section 5 augments the 'ietf-notification-capabilities' model with the leaf and container listed above.

  augment /sysc:system-capabilities/notc:subscription-capabilities:
    +--ro notification-metadata
       +--ro notification-envelope?   boolean {notification-envelope}?
       +--ro metadata

This model can be retrieved via a NETCONF <get> RPC.

3.3. Notification Envelope

This section defines how YANG notifications are structured when the notification envelope is enabled on a YANG-Push subscription. The following sections define how this model is encoded in XML, JSON and CBOR.

3.3.1. Base Notification Model

When a YANG-Push publisher uses the notification model defined in this document, the notification is structured as follows:

  • The notification is encapsulated in a root "envelope" container.
  • The header of the notification contains the metadata that is enabled during the configuration of the subscription as a child nodes of the root "notification-envelope" container.
  • The content of the notification defined by the 'notification' statement is encoded in the 'notification-contents' leaf.

The following YANG tree [RFC8340] illustrates the notification envelope containing the mandatory metadata 'event-time'. See Section 3.4 for more detail on the optional metadata.

  notifications:
    +---n envelope
       +--ro event-time                   yang:date-and-time
       +--ro notification-contents?       <anydata>

3.3.2. Encoding of the Notification model

The YANG notification can be encoded using XML [W3C.REC-xml-20001006][RFC7951], JSON [RFC7951] and CBOR [RFC9254].

3.3.2.1. XML encoding

A YANG notification encoded in XML is structured as a root "envelope" container. The namespace of this container is the namespace defined in the YANG module "ietf-yp-notification":

    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:2.0

Two mandatory child nodes within the "envelope" container are expected, representing the event time and the notification payload. The "event-time" node is defined within the same XML namespace as the "envelope" container. The "event-time" node MUST be compliant with [RFC3339]. Other metadata defined within the YANG module defined in Section 5 MUST use the same XML namespace. See Section 3.4 for more details.

When other metadata is enabled through configuration, the supplementary nodes are encoded at the same level of the mandatory "event-time" node and use the XML namespace defined in the YANG module.

The content of the notification that is defined by the 'notification' statement is encoded in the "notification-contents" node. The name and namespace of this payload element are determined by the YANG module containing the 'notification' statement representing the notification message.

The following example shows a "push-update" notification defined in the YANG module of YANG-Push [RFC8641] encoded in XML:

  <envelope xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:2.0">
    <event-time>2024-10-10T10:59:55.32Z</event-time>
    <notification-contents>
      <push-update xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-push">
        <id>1011</id>
        <datastore-contents>
          <interfaces xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces">
            <interface>
              <name>eth0</name>
              <oper-status>up</oper-status>
            </interface>
          </interfaces>
        </datastore-contents>
      </push-update>
    </notification-contents>
  </envelope>
Figure 1: XML-encoded notification
3.3.2.2. JSON Encoding

A YANG notification encoded in JSON is structured as a root "envelope" container. The namespace of this container is the name of the YANG module "ietf-yp-notification" defined in Section 5.

Two mandatory child nodes within the "ietf-notification:envelope" container are expected, representing the event time and the notification payload. The "event-time" node is defined within the same namespace as the "ietf-yp-notification:envelope" container and is compliant with [RFC3339]. Other metadata defined within the YANG module defined in Section 5 MUST use the same namespace "ietf-yp-notification".

When other metadata is enabled through configuration, the supplementary nodes are encoded at the same level of the mandatory 'event-time' node and use the YANG module name as its namespace. See Section 3.4 for more details.

The content of the notification that is defined by the 'notification' statement is encoded in the "notification-contents" node. The name and namespace of this payload element are determined by the YANG module containing the 'notification' statement representing the notification message.

The following example shows a "push-update" notification defined in the YANG module of YANG-Push [RFC8641] encoded in JSON:

    {
        "ietf-yp-notification:envelope": {
            "event-time": "2024-10-10T08:00:11.22Z",
            "notification-contents": {
              "ietf-yang-push:push-update": {
                  "id": 1011,
                  "datastore-contents": {
                      "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [
                          {
                              "interface": {
                                  "name": "eth0",
                                  "oper-status": "up"
                              }
                          }
                      ]
                  }
              }
            }
        }
    }
Figure 2: JSON-encoded notification
3.3.2.3. CBOR Encoding

YANG notifications can be encoded in CBOR using Names or SIDs in keys.

Notifications encoded using names is similar to JSON encoding as defined in Section 3.3 of [RFC9254]. The key of the element can be the name of the element itself or be namespace-qualified. In the latter case, the namespace of the notification container uses the YANG module name "ietf-yp-notification" defined in Section 5.

Notification encoded using YANG-SIDs replaces the names of the keys of the CBOR encoded message for a 63 bit unsigned integer. In this case, the keys of the encoded data use the SID value as defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC9254]. A SID allocation process is needed beforehand following [I-D.ietf-core-sid].

In the notification, two mandatory child nodes within the "ietf-yp-notification:envelope" container are expected, representing the event time and the notification payload. The "event-time" node is defined within the same namespace as the "ietf-yp-notification:envelope" container and is compliant with [RFC3339].

When other metadata is enabled through configuration, the supplementary nodes are encoded at the same level of the mandatory "event-time" node and use the YANG module name as its namespace when they are encoded as names. When they are encoded using YANG SIDs, a SID value assigned to the metadata node is used. See Section 3.4 for more details.

The content of the notification that is defined by the 'notification' statement is encoded in the "notification-contents" node. The name and namespace of this payload element are determined by the YANG module containing the 'notification' statement representing the notification message. Similarly, SIDs can be used as keys if they are well allocated.

Figure 3 shows a "push-update" notification defined in the YANG module of YANG-Push [RFC8641] encoded in CBOR using names as keys. The example uses the CBOR diagnostic notation as defined in section 3.1 of [RFC9254]:

  {
      "ietf-yp-notification:envelope": {
          "event-time": "2024-10-10T08:00:11.22Z",
          "notification-contents": {
            "ietf-yang-push:push-update": {
                "id": 1011,
                "datastore-contents": {
                    "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [
                        {
                            "interface": {
                                "name": "eth0",
                                "oper-status": "up"
                            }
                        }
                    ]
                }
            }
          }
      }
  }
Figure 3: CBOR-encoded notification using diagnostic notation

And Figure 4 shows the same notifcation encoded using SIDs:

  {
      2551: {
          1: "2024-10-10T08:00:11.22Z",
          4: {
            "ietf-yang-push:push-update": {
                "id": 1011,
                "datastore-contents": {
                    "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [
                        {
                            "interface": {
                                "name": "eth0",
                                "oper-status": "up"
                            }
                        }
                    ]
                }
            }
          }
      }
  }
Figure 4: CBOR-encoded notification using YANG SIDs in CBOR diagnostic notation

3.4. Extensions for the Notification Envelope

This section described two optional YANG notification header extensions which are enabled by default when the notification envelope is enabled. When the envelope is enabled using the "enable-notification-envelope" node, the publisher includes by default the "hostname" and "sequence-number" defined in the following sections. The client discovers the support of these two extension headers with the mechanism defined in Section 3.2.

This document defines the following metadata as shown in the following YANG tree [RFC8340]. See the following sections for more details.

  notifications:
    +---n envelope
       +--ro event-time                   yang:date-and-time
       +--ro hostname?                    inet:host
       |       {notification-hostname-sequence-number}?
       +--ro sequence-number?             yang:counter32
       |       {notification-hostname-sequence-number}?
       +--ro notification-contents?       <anydata>

3.4.1. Support of Hostname and Sequencing in YANG Notifications

When YANG-Push notification messages are forwarded from a receiver to another system, such as a message broker or a time series database, the transport context is lost since it is not part of the metadata of the notification container. Therefore, the downstream system is unable to associate the message to the publishing process (the exporting network node), nor able to detect message loss or reordering.

To correlate network data among different Network Telemetry planes as described in Section 3.1 of [RFC9232] or among different YANG-Push subscription types as defined in Section 3.1 of [RFC8641], a reference to the node streaming the data is needed. This is essential for understanding the timely relationship among these different planes and YANG-Push subscription types.

Today, network operators work around this impediment by preserving the transport source IP address and sequence numbers of the publishing process. However, this implies encoding this information in the YANG-Push notification messages which impacts the semantic readability of the message in the downstream system.

On top of that, the transport source IP address might not represent the management IP address by which the YANG-Push publisher should be known. In other terms, the source-host [RFC6470], which is the "Address of the remote host for the session" might not be the management IP address.

To overcome these issues, this document proposes a notification container extension with a hostname and a sequence number. This allows the downstream system to not only be able to identify from which network node, subscription, and time the message was published but also, the order of the published messages.

hostname:
Describes the node's hostname according to the 'sysName' object definition in [RFC1213] from where the message was published from. This value is usually configured on the node by the administrator to uniquely identify the node in the network.
sequence-number:
Generates a unique sequence number for each published message by the publisher process. The number counts up at every published notification message as described in [RFC9187].

Figure 5 provides an example of a JSON encoded, [RFC8259], "push-update" notification message with hostname and sequence-number as extension.

========== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792) ===========

{
    "ietf-yp-notification:envelope": {
    "event-time": "2023-03-25T08:30:11.22Z",
    "hostname": "example-router",
    "sequence-number": 1,
    "notification-contents": {
      "ietf-yang-push:push-update": {
        "id": 6666,
        "datastore-contents": {
          "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [
            {
              "interface": {
                "name": "eth0",
                "type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
                "oper-status": "up",
                "mtu": 1500
              }
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
Figure 5: JSON Example for a push-update notification message

4. Operational Considerations

TBD: explain co-existence with RFC5277

5. YANG Module

5.1. YANG Tree Diagram

This YANG module extends "ietf-subscribed-notifications" [RFC8641] and "ietf-notification-capabilities" [RFC9196] as shown in the following YANG tree [RFC8340]:

module: ietf-yp-notification

  augment /sn:subscriptions/sn:subscription:
    +--rw enable-notification-envelope?   boolean
    +--rw metadata
  augment /sn:establish-subscription/sn:input:
    +---w enable-notification-envelope?   boolean
    +---w metadata
  augment /sn:modify-subscription/sn:input:
    +---w enable-notification-envelope?   boolean
    +---w metadata
  augment /sysc:system-capabilities/notc:subscription-capabilities:
    +--ro notification-metadata
       +--ro notification-envelope?   boolean
       +--ro metadata
          +--ro hostname-sequence-number?   boolean

  notifications:
    +---n envelope
       +--ro event-time               yang:date-and-time
       +--ro hostname?                inet:host
       +--ro sequence-number?         yang:counter32
       +--ro notification-contents?   <anydata>

5.2. YANG Module

The YANG module augments the module "ietf-subscribed-notifications" [RFC8641], augments the module "ietf-system-capabilities" [RFC9196], and uses "ietf-yang-types" module [RFC6991] and .

<CODE BEGINS> file "[email protected]"

module ietf-yp-notification {
  yang-version 1.1;
  namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:2.0";
  prefix inotenv;
  import ietf-yang-types {
    prefix yang;
    reference
      "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
  }
  import ietf-inet-types {
    prefix inet;
    reference
      "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
  }
  import ietf-subscribed-notifications {
    prefix sn;
    reference
      "RFC 8639: Subscription to YANG Notifications";
  }
  import ietf-system-capabilities {
    prefix sysc;
    reference
      "RFC 9196: YANG Modules Describing Capabilities for
       Systems and Datastore Update Notifications";
  }
  import ietf-notification-capabilities {
    prefix notc;
    reference
      "RFC 9196: YANG Modules Describing Capabilities for
       Systems and Datastore Update Notifications";
  }

  organization "IETF NETCONF (Network Configuration) Working Group";
  contact
    "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/netconf/>
     WG List:  <mailto:[email protected]>

     Authors:  Alex Huang Feng
               <mailto:[email protected]>
               Pierre Francois
               <mailto:[email protected]>
               Thomas Graf
               <mailto:[email protected]>
               Benoit Claise
               <mailto:[email protected]>";

  description
    "Defines a notification header for Subscribed Notifications
    [RFC8639] and YANG-Push [RFC8641]. When this notification header
    is enabled through configuration, the root container of the
    notification is encoded as defined in RFCXXX.

    This module can be used to validate XML encoded notifications
    [RFC7950], JSON encoded messages [RFC7951] and CBOR encoded
    messages [RFC9254]. Refer to Section Y of RFC XXXX for more
    details.

    Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
    authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

    Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
    without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
    the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
    forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
    Relating to IETF Documents
    (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

    This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
    (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself
    for full legal notices.";

  revision 2024-10-18 {
    description
      "First revision";
    reference
      "RFC XXXX: YANG-Push Notification Envelope";
  }

  grouping notif-env-configuration {
    description
      "This grouping defines the configuration switches for
      enabling the notification-envelope defined in RFC XXXX
      and the different supported metadata.";
    leaf enable-notification-envelope {
      type boolean;
      default false;
      description
        "Enables YANG-Push to use the notification-envelope
        defined in RFC XXXX.";
    }
    container metadata {
      description
        "Container for configuring optional metadata.";
    }
  }

  grouping notif-env-capabilities {
    description
      "This grouping defines the capabilities for
      the notification-envelope defined in RFC XXXX
      and the different supported metadata.";
    leaf notification-envelope {
      type boolean;
      default false;
      description
        "Supports YANG-Push to use the notification-envelope
        defined in RFC XXXX.";
    }
    container metadata {
      description
        "Container with the supported optional metadata by the
        YANG-Push publisher.";
      leaf hostname-sequence-number {
        type boolean;
        default false;
        description
          "Supports hostname and sequence-number
          in the YANG-Push notifications as defined in the
          YANG-Push notification-envelope in RFC XXXX.";
      }
    }
  }

  notification envelope {
    leaf event-time {
      type yang:date-and-time;
      mandatory true;
      description
        "The date and time the event was generated by the event
        source. This parameter is of type dateTime and compliant
        to [RFC3339].";
    }
    leaf hostname {
      type inet:host;
      description
        "The hostname of the network node according to
        [RFC1213]. This value is usually configured on the node
        by the administrator to uniquely identify the node in
        the network.";
    }
    leaf sequence-number {
      type yang:counter32;
      description
        "Unique sequence number as described in [RFC9187] for each
        published message.";
    }
    anydata notification-contents {
      description
        "This contains the values defined by the 'notification'
        statement unchanged.";
    }
  }

  // Subscription container
  augment "/sn:subscriptions/sn:subscription" {
    description
      "This augmentation adds the configuration switches for
      enabling the notification envelope and metadatas.";
    uses notif-env-configuration;
  }
  // Subscription RPCs
  augment "/sn:establish-subscription/sn:input" {
    description
      "This augmentation adds the configuration switches for
      enabling the notification envelope and other metadatas
      during the 'establish-subscription' RPC.";
    uses notif-env-configuration;
  }
  augment "/sn:modify-subscription/sn:input" {
    description
      "This augmentation adds the configuration switches for
      enabling the notification envelope and other metadatas
      during the 'establish-subscription' RPC.";
    uses notif-env-configuration;
  }

  // YANG-Push Capabilities extension
  augment "/sysc:system-capabilities/notc:subscription-capabilities" {
    description
      "Extension to the subscription-capabilities model to enable
      clients to learn whether the publisher supports the
      notification-envelope";

    container notification-metadata {
      description
        "Adds the notification metadata capabilities to subscription
        capabilities.";
      uses notif-env-capabilities;
    }
  }
}

<CODE ENDS>

6. Security Considerations

TBD

7. IANA Considerations

This document describes the URI used for the IETF XML Registry and registers a new YANG module name.

7.1. URI

IANA is requested to add this document as a reference in the following URI in the IETF XML Registry [RFC3688].

URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:2.0
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
Reference: RFC-to-be

7.2. YANG module name

This document registers the following YANG module in the YANG Module Names Registry [RFC6020], within the "YANG Parameters" registry:

name: ietf-yp-notification
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:2.0
prefix: inotenv
reference: RFC-to-be

7.3. YANG SID-file

IANA is requested to register a new ".sid" file in the "IETF YANG SID Registry" [I-D.ietf-core-sid]:

SID range entry point: TBD
SID range size: 50
YANG module name: ietf-yp-notification
reference: RFC-to-be

A ".sid" file is proposed in Appendix A.

8. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Per Anderson, Andy Bierman, Carsten Bormann, Mohamed Boucadair, Tom Petch, Jason Sterne, Kent Watsen and Rob Wilton for their review and valuable comments.

9. References

9.1. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-core-sid]
Veillette, M., Pelov, A., Petrov, I., Bormann, C., and M. Richardson, "YANG Schema Item iDentifier (YANG SID)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-core-sid-24, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-core-sid-24>.
[RFC1213]
McCloghrie, K. and M. Rose, "Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets: MIB-II", STD 17, RFC 1213, DOI 10.17487/RFC1213, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1213>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3339]
Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339>.
[RFC3688]
Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC5277]
Chisholm, S. and H. Trevino, "NETCONF Event Notifications", RFC 5277, DOI 10.17487/RFC5277, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5277>.
[RFC6020]
Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241]
Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6991]
Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7950]
Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC7951]
Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG", RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7951>.
[RFC8040]
Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8639]
Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications", RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>.
[RFC8641]
Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.
[RFC8791]
Bierman, A., Björklund, M., and K. Watsen, "YANG Data Structure Extensions", RFC 8791, DOI 10.17487/RFC8791, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8791>.
[RFC8792]
Watsen, K., Auerswald, E., Farrel, A., and Q. Wu, "Handling Long Lines in Content of Internet-Drafts and RFCs", RFC 8792, DOI 10.17487/RFC8792, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8792>.
[RFC9187]
Touch, J., "Sequence Number Extension for Windowed Protocols", RFC 9187, DOI 10.17487/RFC9187, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9187>.
[RFC9196]
Lengyel, B., Clemm, A., and B. Claise, "YANG Modules Describing Capabilities for Systems and Datastore Update Notifications", RFC 9196, DOI 10.17487/RFC9196, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9196>.
[RFC9254]
Veillette, M., Ed., Petrov, I., Ed., Pelov, A., Bormann, C., and M. Richardson, "Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG in the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)", RFC 9254, DOI 10.17487/RFC9254, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9254>.
[W3C.REC-xml-20001006]
Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, M., and E. Maler, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition)", W3C, , <https://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006>.

9.2. Informative References

[RFC6470]
Bierman, A., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Base Notifications", RFC 6470, DOI 10.17487/RFC6470, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6470>.
[RFC8259]
Bray, T., Ed., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format", STD 90, RFC 8259, DOI 10.17487/RFC8259, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8259>.
[RFC8340]
Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC9232]
Song, H., Qin, F., Martinez-Julia, P., Ciavaglia, L., and A. Wang, "Network Telemetry Framework", RFC 9232, DOI 10.17487/RFC9232, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9232>.

Appendix A. .sid file

Note to the RFC-Editor: Please remove this section before publishing.

For CBOR encoding using YANG-SIDs identifiers, a ".sid" file is requested to IANA in Section 7.3.

<CODE BEGINS> file "[email protected]"

{
  "ietf-sid-file:sid-file": {
    "module-name": "ietf-yp-notification",
    "module-revision": "2024-10-10",
    "description": "YANG-Push Notification Envelope",
    "dependency-revision": [
      {
        "module-name": "ietf-yang-types",
        "module-revision": "2013-07-15"
      },
      {
        "module-name": "ietf-subscribed-notifications",
        "module-revision": "2019-09-09"
      }
    ],
    "assignment-range": [
      {
        "entry-point": "2550",
        "size": "50"
      }
    ],
    "item": [
      {
        "namespace": "module",
        "identifier": "ietf-yp-notification",
        "sid": "2550"
      },
      {
        "namespace": "data",
        "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope",
        "sid": "2551"
      },
      {
        "namespace": "data",
        "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope/event-time",
        "sid": "2552"
      },
      {
        "namespace": "data",
        "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope/hostname",
        "sid": "2553"
      },
      {
        "namespace": "data",
        "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope/sequence-number",
        "sid": "2554"
      },
      {
        "namespace": "data",
        "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope/notification-contents",
        "sid": "2555"
      }
    ]
  }
}

<CODE ENDS>
Figure 6: .sid file for "ietf-yp-notification" module

Authors' Addresses

Alex Huang Feng
INSA-Lyon
Lyon
France
Pierre Francois
INSA-Lyon
Lyon
France
Thomas Graf
Swisscom
Binzring 17
CH-8045 Zurich
Switzerland
Benoit Claise
Huawei