patch-2.3.99-pre8 linux/include/asm-s390/semaphore-helper.h
Next file: linux/include/asm-s390/semaphore.h
Previous file: linux/include/asm-s390/segment.h
Back to the patch index
Back to the overall index
- Lines: 101
- Date:
Fri May 12 11:41:44 2000
- Orig file:
v2.3.99-pre7/linux/include/asm-s390/semaphore-helper.h
- Orig date:
Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.3.99-pre7/linux/include/asm-s390/semaphore-helper.h linux/include/asm-s390/semaphore-helper.h
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/*
+ * include/asm-s390/semaphore-helper.h
+ *
+ * S390 version
+ * Copyright (C) 1999 IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, IBM Corporation
+ *
+ * Derived from "include/asm-i386/semaphore-helper.h"
+ * (C) Copyright 1996 Linus Torvalds
+ * (C) Copyright 1999 Andrea Arcangeli
+ */
+
+#ifndef _S390_SEMAPHORE_HELPER_H
+#define _S390_SEMAPHORE_HELPER_H
+
+/*
+ * These two _must_ execute atomically wrt each other.
+ *
+ * This is trivially done with load_locked/store_cond,
+ * but on the x86 we need an external synchronizer.
+ */
+static inline void wake_one_more(struct semaphore * sem)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&semaphore_wake_lock, flags);
+ sem->waking++;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&semaphore_wake_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static inline int waking_non_zero(struct semaphore *sem)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&semaphore_wake_lock, flags);
+ if (sem->waking > 0) {
+ sem->waking--;
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&semaphore_wake_lock, flags);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * waking_non_zero_interruptible:
+ * 1 got the lock
+ * 0 go to sleep
+ * -EINTR interrupted
+ *
+ * If we give up we must undo our count-decrease we previously did in down().
+ * Subtle: up() can continue to happens and increase the semaphore count
+ * even during our critical section protected by the spinlock. So
+ * we must remeber to undo the sem->waking that will be run from
+ * wake_one_more() some time soon, if the semaphore count become > 0.
+ */
+static inline int waking_non_zero_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem,
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&semaphore_wake_lock, flags);
+ if (sem->waking > 0) {
+ sem->waking--;
+ ret = 1;
+ } else if (signal_pending(tsk)) {
+ if (atomic_inc_and_test_greater_zero(&sem->count))
+ sem->waking--;
+ ret = -EINTR;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&semaphore_wake_lock, flags);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * waking_non_zero_trylock:
+ * 1 failed to lock
+ * 0 got the lock
+ *
+ * Implementation details are the same of the interruptible case.
+ */
+static inline int waking_non_zero_trylock(struct semaphore *sem)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 1;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&semaphore_wake_lock, flags);
+ if (sem->waking <= 0)
+ {
+ if (atomic_inc_and_test_greater_zero(&sem->count))
+ sem->waking--;
+ } else {
+ sem->waking--;
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&semaphore_wake_lock, flags);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+#endif
FUNET's LINUX-ADM group, [email protected]
TCL-scripts by Sam Shen (who was at: [email protected])