This is a follow up to the previous review: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04-tsvart-lc-westerlund-2018-04-04/
 
Thanks for resolving the previously raised issues. 

I did notice in Section 4.1 that the following paragraph:

   The Block Size will interact with the MTU size.  Especially for
   length values that are a large fraction of the MTU, unless the block
   length is chosen so that a multiple just fits into the MTU, Block
   Length Padding may cause unneccessary fragmentation for UDP based
   delivery.  Also, chosing a block length larger than the MTU of course
   forces to always fragment.

Is repeated with just one paragraph between them.